The Lion King is a authoritative film. beloved by many. On the surface. this film seems to be a blithe. unworried narrative of a king of beasts cub’s journey to justness. However. on taking a deeper expression. one finds that the narrative consists of conflicting worldviews and doctrines. while showing the thought of fate. But which faiths and doctrines is it portraying? Let us take a closer expression. Some would reason that Christianity is the chiefly presented faith in the Lion King. After analyzing many different spiritual and worldviews. one can see that there a many different spiritual overtones. All these faiths seem to clash in a kind of New Age feeling. It displays the demand for tolerance and that what might be true for some is non needfully true for others.
So when 1 is meeting a new faith. the first inquiry is typically “Who is God? ” Who is God in the Lion King? At first glimpse Mufasa. caput of the king of beasts pride. seems to be the ultimate symbol of authorization and authorization. Does this mean he should be considered as the “god” in the narrative? Surely non. In one scene. Mufasa and Simba are holding a male parent boy conversation. in which Mufasa tells his boy about the “Great Kings of the yesteryear. ” Clearly. Mufasa is neither the first nor needfully the greatest caput of authorization. We see. besides. the full animate being land purely following the doctrine of the “circle of life. ” Everything is working together to profit each other. This thought dips into the thought of pantheism: everything is godly in nature.
So is everything God? Again. no. there is a clear hierarchy of the carnal land. We see yet another force presented as a higher power. Rafiki is guided by nature ( the air current. foliages. etc. ) and this seems to be his governing force. Truthfully. we would likely merely sort Rafiki as a hippy and travel on. Still. this is a worldview. and must be taken into history. So. truly. the “god” in Lion King is whoever that peculiar character perceives it to be. There is a clear differentiation of good and evil in the Lion male monarch. but what about wickedness and righteousness? Scar. the brother of Mufasa. is the adversary. He is depicted as the immorality force which must be overcome.
On the other manus. Mufasa is the emblem of good and hope. which will finally go Simba. When Simba flees after being convinced. by Scar. that he is now a liquidator. Scar comes to power. We see his evil and destructive ways impacting the lives and status of the full animate being land. After sing a kind of vision of his male parent. Simba returns to deliver his rightful topographic point as swayer and reconstruct things to moral. This is easy comparable to Christianity. as Father God sent his Son. Jesus. to expiate humanity. But there is merely evident moral incorrect. instead than evildoing against a godly jurisprudence.
Though corruptness and immorality is present. there is no blazing illustration of wickedness as defined by God. One of the cardinal elements in the Lion King is the thought of hereafter. Near the beginning of the film Mufasa describes the circle of life by physical agencies. He informs that though they eat the antelope. when they. the king of beastss. dice. their organic structures turn to the grass which the antelope. in bend. eat. This shows what happens to the physical organic structure after decease. but what about the spirit? Subsequently in the film. Simba is lead to a glade in which a Mufasa returns in the signifier of a storm. The “Mufasa cloud” speaks to Simba. The thought that the psyche goes someplace after decease is obvious.
However. the after decease location of the psyche is ne’er identified. and there is no grounds that tells us if there is a topographic point for virtuous and a topographic point for the wicked. If we consider Mufasa as God. and. accordingly. Simba as the Son of God. we are able to see interaction of the Godhead and the person on a personal degree. Nala calls on Simba for aid. which causes Simba to name on Mufasa for aid. However. because there is non merely a individual defined Godhead swayer for everyone. we can merely reply that yes. God is depicted a personal. God is. in fact. presented as personal. impersonal. and populating throughout everything ensuing in the deficiency of the demand of a personal God.
So what is a person’s duty if God could be all three of the above? At first it seems as though the film might take a mildly dismaying moral bend in Timon and Pumba’s suggestion that a individual should populate by the slogan of “Hakuna Matata. ” approximately translated as “no concerns. ” This would intend that a individual should non take into history others. the hereafter. or. truly. anything. How could this be right? It can non be.
That slogan is about reprimanded when we see that Simba does hold a intent to carry through: to reconstruct the morally corrupt land now overrun with Scars loyal followings. the hyaena. Simba does necessitate to worry about the province of the king of beastss that were left under his duty. It the terminal. we see the absolute demand for each character. and ourselves. to run into our duties. In decision. It is apparent that spiritual thoughts are a cardinal subject in the Lion King. The constructs offered in this film will maintain people believing for old ages to come. Such a film can learn us valuable lessons. and we can larn even more by analyzing it. Hopefully dateless classics which challenge us doctrines will go on to be made.
Need Essay Sample?
We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page
Essay on Martin Luther King's Successful Philosophy
1019 Words5 Pages
Nearly three centuries ago, black men and women from Africa were brought to America and put into slavery. They were treated more cruelly in the United States than in any other country that had practiced slavery. African Americans didn’t gain their freedom until after the Civil War, nearly one-hundred years later. Even though African Americans were freed and the constitution was amended to guarantee racial equality, they were still not treated the same as whites and were thought of as second class citizens. One man had the right idea on how to change America, Martin Luther King Jr. had the best philosophy for advancing civil rights, he preached nonviolence to express the need for change in America and he united both African Americans…show more content…
In the fifties, segregation existed in every state, but it was strongest in the South where Public Schools, transportation, hotels, and restaurants were all segregated. King convinced thousands of African Americans in Montgomery, Alabama to refuse to ride the city buses because they were segregated. For thirteen months African Americans in Montgomery walked to work instead of riding the segregated buses. Eventually, the loss of revenue and a decision by the Supreme Court forced the Montgomery Bus Company to accept integration. After his success in Montgomery, King organized the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which gave him a base to pursue further civil rights activities, first in the South and later nationwide. In 1960 King moved himself and his family to Montgomery to devote more of his effort towards the work of the SCLC. King traveled the country making speeches and inspiring people to become involved in the civil rights movement. King argued that as African Americans made up ten percent of the population, they had considerable economic power. By selective buying, they could reward companies that were sympathetic to the civil rights movement while punishing those who still segregated their workforce. By boycotting, they were able to pressure the companies into hiring more African Americans. King wrote a book in 1958 entitled Stride Toward